- Capital Contrarian
- Posts
- Profit vs Cash - Big Difference for Businesses
Profit vs Cash - Big Difference for Businesses
Math vs Feelings - Big Difference for Decisions
Email agenda:
Estimated read time: 6 minutes 18 seconds
Profit vs Cash - Big Difference for Businesses
Math vs Feelings
Good morning and happy Monday - let's get smarter
Profit vs Cash - Big Difference for Businesses
One of the best things about my time in M&A was the ability to look at multiple different businesses every day
To see their revenue and expense drivers, to see what business models demand higher multiples (bigger valuation) vs not
As I have transitioned into a world of talking with and working with startups and smaller business owner's, I realized there is a big issue
Most people don't understand that PROFIT is NOT CASH
PROFIT = Sales - Costs
That part is very straightforward
However, let's talk about a situation that can put you in a much worse cash position despite having a big sale
Cash is NOT Profit and Poor Cash Management
Let's say you own a big construction company and you just won a contract for $100,000
You have $50k in your business bank account
Hell yeah - that's a big win, $150k cash balance coming in HOT
You think to yourself, this will cost about $40,000 in supplies and direct labor (workers) to complete so that's $60,000 in profit
Well - here's where things get dicey from a cash perspective
Let's say the job will take 1 month and you agree to send the invoice when its complete
You now have to go out, pay for $20,000 of supplies (cash -$20,000) and over the next 30 days you will be paying your workers another $20,000 in labor (cash -$20,000)
You have now put yourself in a bad cash management position, because you have basically floated $40,000 over 30 days without receiving a $
Current cash balance: $10,000 in the bank account
Now after the job is complete 30 days later, you send out a net 30 invoice for $100,000
So here again, you have had costs, you have had "sales", you are making a profit, but you still don't have CASH
Your cash can come after your sales
Continuing this example
You have $10,000 in the bank account and now you have to take on other jobs, and your customer still has 30 days until the invoice is due
What if they don't pay in 30 days?
You have now put yourself in poor cash management position where you have all of your outflows of cash going out before any inflows
You could now go NEGATIVE in your bank account to pay our supplies for the next job and for labor until you receive that $100,000 of CASH
DESPITE having sales
This is common across a lot of businesses where profit is misunderstood for cash and cash management and timing of cash flows is misunderstood
The goal in business is to collect cash as quickly as possible, and pay out cash as slow as possible
On an accrual basis for accounting, this business owner would have recognized SALES on day 1 of $100,000, so the income statement would look GREAT
BUT
Their bank balance as the project progressed would not look great
Math vs Feelings
As humans, one of our biggest bias is the narrative fallacy
I believe this probably comes from our ancestors using stories to pass along information
The narrative fallacy states that people tend to construct a narrative to explain an event or sequence of events that may just be completely random or that has no justification or explanation
This concept really hit me during COVID when I would talk to people about financial markets
They would ALL relay the story that they heard on CNBC but had no statistical facts or math to back it
I would be willing to bet if you ask someone what the stock market will do in 2023 or what oil prices will be, or how TSLA will perform the FIRST thing they will do is tell you a narrative
That's the problem - we make decisions based on our FEELINGS and STORIES we tell ourselves but WE as people are biased
A friend recently asked me what I thought about buying $TSLA stock
Me being a pain in the ass, I said "tell me what you think?"
"Well the stock is cheap and Cathie Wood is continuing to buy....."
Let's analyze this
"Cheap" -> Cheap refers to price
That shirt is cheap or that watch is cheap
PRICE is what it costs but VALUE is what it's worth
If I told you that the value of the car was $80,000 but the price is $50,000
That'd be a great deal right?
If you don't have a sense of TSLA's VALUE to compare to the price, then the price or it being CHEAP is irrelevant
Point #2 -> Cathie Wood
This is the performance of Cathie Wood's ETF over the past 5 years
You could again, say that her ETF $ARKK is CHEAP
But, you'd be again looking at the price and not the value
You see, we are able to tell ourselves a story in our head that might make sense to us and to others, but there isn't data to back any of it up, just human bias
A better way to look at it would be as such:
What is going on in the macro environment today?
Is GDP going to slow or accelerate in the US over the coming year?
Is the fed going to continue to try and slow inflation and raise rates?
Where will inflation be in 12 months?
Where will interest rates be in 12 months?
OK -> now that I have answered all of these ^, how has TSLA performed under these market conditions in the past
No, the past is not a perfect predictor of the future, but it can show us that based on actual data of slowing GDP and slowing inflation, how has TSLA done
I'd rather analyze a similar macro environment and track past performance than use stories
Math > stories and feelings
Now maybe TSLA is too new to have been around during a similar economic period
So maybe you just have no thesis on it and stay away
BUT you have to be careful as well when using data and math
You have to think about how many data points do you have, is there bias in my data, is the amount of time long enough to make a judgement on this, etc
As you can see, the math and the money game are HARD
So instead of thinking and researching data, people use narratives and stories
There are tons of them out there, so be careful who you believe
I can tell you for a fact that if you are interested in stories AND interested in losing money, then I found the perfect person for you!
If the S&P 500 is positive for the first 5 days of the year, the stock market has ended the year with a positive return 77% of the time (since 2000).
Chart created by u/Square_Tea4916 http
— Pomp 🌪 (@APompliano)
3:39 AM • Jan 12, 2023
What's wrong with this tweet?
A few quick items:
Taking a sample size of only 2020 on (we've been in an interest rate declining boom for most of this time period)
Using a random small sample size of the first 5 days to explain markets returns for a year (more likely than not these have 0 correlation and is purely random)
As the chart below from Artemis Capital shows, depending on your age, you have likely been around during one of the greatest times for both stocks and bond performance
In order to make a better projection, you could take the past 100 years of data as you can from 1900 on there were many different economic overlays, and THEN leverage all of that data to make assumptions and predictions
We're humans and stories rule the world
But remember that we are biased
Think facts, figures, and math
Because as I love to say, "the best part about math is math doesn't give a f*** about your feelings"
Dev
DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.