- Capital Contrarian
- Posts
- Big Luck = Take Big Bets
Big Luck = Take Big Bets
The Future is SaaS
Email agenda:
Estimated read time: 7 minutes 16 seconds
7 SaaS Metrics That Matter Most
Big Bets = Big Luck?
Good morning and happy Monday - let's get smarter
7 SaaS Metrics That Matter Most
As technology like artificial intelligence continues to improve, more and more companies will be technology-based or use more and more technology to increase efficiency and effectiveness
IMO, more and more people will be employed by SaaS companies big and small over the next 10 years than ever before
Last Monday, we talked about employees of private companies receiving phantom equity
One thing that's important to understand is the value of the business that you are receiving options, phantom equity, or regular equity, in
This will help you figure out how much your % is worth, and if that amount is substantial enough to forgive a higher salary and higher stability at a larger company for a more risk based startup
As we have discussed, most SaaS businesses are valued as enterprise value / revenue or EV/Revenue
Simply put - they are valued based on a revenue multiple (top line), where most businesses are valued based on EBITDA their proxy for recurring cash flows
So what makes some SaaS companies more valuable than others? These metrics are a key factors to know in order to determine a SaaS companies revenue multiple
Top 7 Most Important SaaS Metrics to Track
During bull markets when VC’s have an excess amount of dollars to allocate, high-growth startups can have frothy valuation multiples like 100x revenue
When markets turn, investors tend to care more about free cash flow and other key performance indicators rather than only focusing on growth
Key performance indicators or KPIs tell you about the operational efficiency of the business
How effectively is your company managing cash flows?
What is the cost to acquire a customer and how long is the sales cycle?
Depending on what you read or who you listen to, you’ll hear about 6,000 metrics that are important and you can quickly fall into analysis paralysis
Tracking these metrics allows you to make better spending decisions, hiring decisions, control your cash flows, etc.
We have highlighted the top 7 most important metrics that the founder(s) and finance team should be following via a financial dashboard weekly and reviewing monthly:
ARR or Revenue per employee
Take your total revenue or your annual recurring revenue and divides by the number of full-time employees
The metric gives you insight into the efficiency/effectiveness of your workforce
The higher the ratio, the more effective
However - if this ratio is high due to not hiring enough staff and churning and burning your current employees, then you have a problem
Employee churn will make this ratio look better, but will be an even bigger problem
Look at this metric in connection with employee morale and compare it to other companies in your industry of your size
Cash burn
Total monthly revenue - total monthly expenses
Your cash burn looks at the rate you are burning cash and you can apply it to your cash balance to figure out your cash runway
This is where having a dashboard with variance analysis is extremely important so you can see what expenses are contributing the most to the cash burn, what drove it higher than expected
Cash runway
Total cash / cash burn
Your cash runway is the number of months you have remaining before you run out of cash based on your cash burn
Ideally, especially during more difficult fundraising items (i.e., recessions or economic slowdowns), it’s a good practice to keep 18 months of cash in the bank at least
Burn multiple
Cash burn / net new ARR or net new revenue
This metric is an efficiency metric that looks at how much revenue are you generating from every dollar of cash burn
If you raised capital, investors also like to see your burn multiple to get an understanding of how well you are allocating the capital that you raised aka how effectively are you spending investor dollars
Your target for this metric is as close to zero as possible
Gross Margin
Revenue - cost of revenues / revenue (gross profit / revenue)
Gross margin tells you the percentage of profit on revenues after factoring in the variable costs needed to generate the revenue
SaaS companies typically have gross margins around 65-75%
Your cost of revenues should include hosting services, engineering salaries, and other salaries that directly work with customers as opposed to just operations overall
CAC Ratio
Sales & Marketing Expenses / New ARR + Upsell ARR
Your CAC ratio tells you how much sales & marketing spend it takes to generate every incremental dollar of ARR of revenue either by new customer acquisition or by upsells
A CAC ratio of less than 1 is the goal
Operating Leverage
% Change in Operating Profit / % Change in Revenue
Degree of operating leverage shows you how much of every dollar of revenue or ARR is converting into profit based on your fixed and variable cost percentages
Typically, a company with a higher value of operating leverage is expected to have an increase in profitability with an increase in revenue, as higher revenue. On the other hand, a company with a lower value of operating leverage experiences little to no change in its profitability with an increase in revenue.
However, it is important to note that a company with high operating leverage is exposed to the risk of financial losses in case of a significant decline in revenue as a large portion of the cost structure is fixed in nature
Big Bets = Big Luck?
Placing big bets in life, investments, etc, is not often talked about
One of the most common similarities I see when talking to people is the the people who typically take big bets in their life also take big bets in markets
The people who play it safe and diversify in life almost always do the same in their life as well
I dig some digging on placing big bets across markets to try and understand which really is better
Here's what I found:
Stan Druckenmiller lost $3 billion in 6 weeks on one trade in the dotcom bubble
When asked what he learned?
“I didn’t learn anything. I already knew I wasn’t supposed to do that I was an emotional basket case and couldn’t help myself”
Some big name examples 👇
Stan is worth $5.6 billion and has returned 30%+ for DECADES
That’s not just hard it’s almost impossible
Peter Lynch even said you can make a lot of money being right 6/10 times
Peter Lynch averaged a return of 29.2% for his clients over decade plus
So what’s the best route then? Diversify or “bet big when you have conviction”
I explore 👇
Stan Druckenmiller: “I think diversification and all the stuff they're teaching at business school today is probably the most misguided concept everywhere”
Disney
Disney is a widely successful company by all accounts
Disney also went bankrupt
Disney produced hundreds of films that lost them a TON of $
What changed? Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs earned $8 million in 1938 and transformed Disney
So was Disney lucky or did they shoot a lot of shots and get luck on their side?
VC funds
The Disney approach reminds me a lot of VC funds
VC funds know that almost all of their investments will fail
They don’t care. They know that if 1-2 of them hit it will generate enough return to cover all of their losses AND generate a return
Again.. Taking a lot of bets and one hitting big
George Soros
George Soros took a large bet against the Bank of England in 1992 taking positions against the british pound
The result?
George Soros made $1.5bn on the trade
He had conviction, and placed a very large bet
Warren Buffett
Nobody can deny Buffett’s success. However, even his partner Charlie Munger stated that if you removed some of their largest successes their returns would be modest at best
Warren Buffett paid $2.35bn for Geico. His profit (without dividends) on the trade?
$41.6bn PROFIT. He made a return of 48,000+%
Chris Rock
Everybody who has seen his stand-up can admit he is hilarious
But most people don’t know before he goes to large venues to perform he goes to a ton of smaller venues and practices his jokes
He uses this to figure out what will hit with bigger crowds and what won’t
He places a lot of bet’s, then narrows it down
Netflix
Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said “our hit ratio is way too low. I am always pushing our content team. We have to take more risk and try more crazy things”
They fail a lot and place a lot of bets
Amazon
Amazon had an absolute DUD with the fire phone
Amazon probably has countless ideas that fail every year
Amazon Web Services didn’t fail and that one good idea can change everything
Is it luck or skill?
I think it’s both
“Tails drive everything” - Morgan Housel
If you think about a standard distribution, the outermost points are called “tails”
Tail risk: Tail risk is risk that arises when the possibility that an investment will move more than three standard deviations from the mean is greater than what is shown by a normal distribution
My opinion after reading all of these and doing some thinking myself is you don’t know how much is look and how much is skill
But placing big bets where you have skill and high conviction I believe can ultimately be what creates the impression of luck
- Dev
DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.